Soapy Smith's Soap Box

December 24, 2023

Confidence man "Soapy" Smith in Georgetown, Colorado, 1885

"Loose money in Georgetown"
Denver Rocky Mountain News
September 14, 1885

(Click image to enlarge)

id "Soapy" Smith operate in Georgetown, Colorado, in September 1885?

Short answer: Most likely.

The following was published in the Denver Rocky Mountain News, September 14, 1885.

There must be considerable loose money in Georgetown, to judge from the number of quack doctors and soap and jewelry peddlers and other confidence men who have been flocking in here for the past few weeks.

This is the first I have seen where Soapy Smith likely went to Georgetown, known as the "silver queen of Colorado." It makes perfect sense to me that Soapy operated there. Soapy's timeline for this period is sparse but does open up the possibility of a trip to Georgetown.
On August 25, 1885, the Denver Rocky Mountain News reported a robbery in Denver in which the victim was drugged.

John Lewis wandered into a Larimer Street dive last night and became intoxicated. While in that condition he was placed in a hack, taken outside the city limits and robbed of between $400 and $500. He was then dumped out on the prairie where he lay insensible till nearly morning, when he made his way to the city and reported his loss. He claims that he was drugged, and he probably was, as the gang who hangs around the notorious resort would not stop at murder if a $5 bill were in sight. This is the second occurrence of the kind that has happened at the same place within the past week.

Drugging victims in saloons became popular for a period in Denver. It has not been established that Jeff knew anyone involved in these robberies or whether he was receiving tribute from those responsible. It can be guessed that he was and that probably he called a halt to them. They shocked the residents of Denver, who demanded something be done. A large percentage of these drug-induced robberies dropped off as quickly as they had begun, but they did not cease entirely.

Interest in arresting the guilty did not come from law enforcement but the ever-vigilant Rocky Mountain News. On the day of the story about the Lewis robbery, the News reported that about thirty bunco men were headed for Boulder and the fireman’s tournament:

“There are pickpockets and soap men and shell men, eight die men, top and bottom men, flim-flamers and the smiler with the shells, and all the rest of the boys.”

Associating Soapy Smith and “the boys” with the robberies was an easy link for readers. Did the robbery of Lewis raise the profile of Soapy and the bunco brotherhood? The answer seems clear. Why else would “the brotherhood’s” travel to Boulder be newsworthy?
Nineteen days after the Georgetown report, on October 3, 1885, "Jeff Smith" and Mike Rainey are arrested for assaulting John Koch, a probable victim.

CONCLUSION: Though Soapy's name is not mentioned in Georgetown, it's likely that the soap peddler in Georgetown was Soapy Smith.

Visit the Soapy Smith Soap Box blog

"History with its flickering lamp stumbles along the trail of the past, trying to reconstruct its scenes, to revive its echoes, and kindle with pale gleams the passion of former days."

—Winston Churchill

December 22, 2023

Is this the first record of "Soapy" Smith running the soap sell racket in Denver?

IS THIS SOAPY SMITH?
Denver Rocky Mountain News
May 4, 1881

(Click image to enlarge)

IRST EVIDENCE OF SOAPY SMITH IN DENVER?

In my book, Alias Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel, I use George T. Buffum's eye-witness account as the earliest account of Soapy Smith performing the infamous prize package soap sell in Denver. The year is 1879. Mr. Buffum recorded what he witnessed in a 1906 collection of sketches of his frontier experiences.

I first saw him in the spring of 1879. Standing in front of the old Grand Central Hotel one day, I saw approaching me a man driving a bay horse hitched to a light buggy. He stopped by my side and lifted a box from the bottom of the buggy seat, and I noticed that it contained several cakes of soap. Looking at me squarely in the face, he said, “Will you allow me to present you with fifty dollars?” I declined with thanks, though such benevolence might have received more consideration had I been more familiar with his game.[1]

In an 1889 Rocky Mountain News interview, when asked how long he had lived in Denver, Soapy replied, “Since 1879, but not steady...,”[2]. This does match the year George Buffum claims to have seen Soapy, but it is not solid evidence.

Recently, I took the time to research the Rocky Mountain News, using the search engines on GenealogyBank newspaper archives and came across the news clipping at top.

The soap and lottery man is the centre[sic] of attraction on the streets now evenings, and the hard working laborer pays fifty cents for one cent's worth of soap and the privilege of drawing a blank.

Could this be the first newspaper evidence of Soapy operating the prize package soap racket in Denver? There is always the chance that it is another bunko man operating the soap racket.

Business licenses obtained by 21-year-old Jefferson Randolph Smith II during this period confirm that he was a nomad confidence man traveling around the West. Most of the licensing was not recorded or has been lost in time, but a few examples survive to give a glimpse of his travels. The earliest known, was sent to “J. R. Smith Esqr.,” in Fort Worth, Texas, in response to his request from the Georgia comptroller general in Atlanta, dated March 3, 1881.

Dear Sir- Your favor of the 24th to grant lender the lease of this state you will have to pay a sum of twenty-five dollars for each day’s exhibition in every city or town of five thousand inhabitants; twenty dollars in city or town of four thousand & under five thousand inhabitants; fifteen dollars in city or town with less than four thousand inhabitants; said tax to be paid to the tax collector in each county where the exhibition takes place. Yours Respectfully W. A. Wright, Comp Genl.

Compared with licensing costs secured elsewhere, the Georgia fees were very high, making it doubtful Jeff ever worked his criminal trade within the borders of his home state.

At the end of the month, March 30, 1881, Soapy is in a New Orleans courtroom for "assault and battery." Thirty-six days later the Denver soap racket story is published, having given Soapy plenty of time to be in Denver to operate the swindle. The next location known for Soapy is dated eight months later, when Soapy, listed as being from "Fort Worth," and Soapy's con-man partner, John T. Waller, listed as being from "Denver," register at a hotel in Las Vegas, New Mexico.

There were other prize package soap swindlers operating around the nation. and this is the first newspaper mention I could find regarding them in Colorado. Considering the timeline of Soapy's whereabouts during this period, it is very possible, perhaps even probable, that Jeff R. Smith was running the con game in Denver, where he would earn the alias of "Soapy," known across the West for the soap swindle.

Fourteen months later, July 16, 1882, the Denver Rocky Mountain News published another incident involving the soap racket swindle.

Is this also Soapy?
Denver Rocky Mountain News
July 16, 1882

(Click image to enlarge)

The cheap soap man with his prize money scheme made his appearance here Thursday. After he had opened up his wares on the street and inaugurated his deceptive prize scheme, he was promptly taken in tow by an officer of the law. He was given a chance to get out of town in a hurry.

Is this Soapy? Or another confidence man?

Seven days prior to the above publication, Soapy is running the soap sell in Astoria, Oregon. This is confirmed in one of his notebooks. It is standard during this nomad period that Soapy rarely stayed long in anyone town. Sometimes he left the state, working a period of time in another state, only to return to the previous state, sometimes even the previous town! This was plenty of time for Soapy to arrive in Denver, work the swindle, and travel back to Portland, Oregon where about fifteen days later, on August 2nd, he is once again operating the soap con.

Once again, Soapy's timeline does not contradict with the possibility that he operated the soap swindle in both published incidences, or one of them, or neither of them.

The next example is still possibly Soapy's handiwork.

Is this Soapy?
Denver Rocky Mountain News
July 29, 1882

(Click image to enlarge)

The patent soap peddlers, who make pretensions of giving prize money packages with their soap, were taken in by the limb of the law Thursday evening immediately after they had commenced their operations on the street corner.

Is this Soapy? Possibly, but less likely than the other two published examples. The clipping mentions that the soap men were "taken in" on Thursday, which would be July 27, 1882. If Soapy was given bond that evening, he had six days to get to Portland, Oregon by August 2, 1882, the date the Daily Standard published the article, "The Latest Racket," detailing a soap racket operating there.

CONCLUSION: The next best piece of evidence would be to find "Jeff R. Smith" listed as signing a Denver hotel register near the dates of the three newspaper stories. Even better would be to find one of Soapy's personal notebooks detailing his travels during this period. Though these are not provenance, I will take the presumption that one, two or possibly all three, are about Soapy Smith.

NOTES:

[1] Buffum, pp. 26-27.
[2] Rocky Mountain News, August 6, 1889.

Visit the Soapy Smith Soap Box blog

"All the ancient histories, as one of our wits say, are just fables that have been agreed upon."

—Voltaire, Jeannot et Colin

September 14, 2023

Soapy Smith's stereo-view photograph in Leadville, Colorado, July 21, 1880

Soapy Smith in Leadville, Colorado
July 21, 1880
Soapy and partner, rear, between carriages
Courtesy Kyle Rosene collection

(Click image to enlarge)

Soapy Smith's stereo-view photograph
Leadville, Colorado, July 21, 1880

Where was it taken?

WHERE IN LEADVILLE WAS THIS TAKEN?

(Click image to enlarge)

Those who have read Alias Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel may recall seeing the photograph (#6A) above, in the first photograph section of the book.
Soapy sent the above stereo-view card to his sister in Texas, writing on the back

This is a crew of freighters we met in Leadville on the 21st of July 1880 in the morning on the day that Gen Grant arrived. You can see my photo by looking between the two wagons next to the man with the apron and his sleeves rolled up. JRS. [Soapy is between the two men, or in the rear, 3rd from the left]

In other writing Soapy tells his sister Eva that the former president (1869-1877) is on horseback in the background. If you look closely you can see Grant on a very blurry horse.
It is Leadville, Colorado, July 21, 1880, the day ex-president U. S. Grant arrived in the city. There is a parade in his honor and photographers Luke and Wheeler set up a stereo-view camera to take some photographic mementos of the day's celebration. The camera faces north on Harrison Avenue when Soapy and an unnamed bunko partner step into the street to have their picture taken.

The exact location of where Soapy and the photographers were located has been a long-standing question. The older biographies (The Reign of Soapy Smith and Soapy Smith" King of the Frontier Con Men) mention Soapy operating his soap sell racket on the corners of Harrison Ave., and 3rd street, but did not list a source. This photograph was taken on Harrison about a block away from 3rd street, but that means little as far as provenance goes.
Two Facebook friends and historians in my Soapy Smith's Old West group, Mr. Don Hendershot and Mr. Gary Demoney, took up the task of trying to pinpoint the location. Photographs, maps and knowledge were shared on Leadville's streets. Mr. Hendershot examined the photograph and determined that Soapy was likely standing at 2nd street and Harrison Avenue. Mr. Demoney sent me an 1882 bird's eye view of Leadville, and by comparing the buildings in the photo with those in the bird's eye view, I was able to pinpoint where Soapy was standing when the photographer took the picture. Soapy was on Harrison Avenue, between 2nd and Chestnut streets.

Bird's eye view Leadville, Co., 1882
Full map
Denver Public Library Special Collections
Call Number CG4314.L51882.S8

(Click image to enlarge)

Bird's eye view Leadville, Co., 1882
Close-up
Denver Public Library Special Collections
Call Number CG4314.L51882.S8

(Click image to enlarge)

Sanborn map 1883
Harrison Ave., between 2nd and Chestnut streets
Where Soapy was standing for the photograph
Library of Congress

(Click image to enlarge)

Leadville, Colorado today
Approximate spot where Soapy stood
Google Maps

(Click image to enlarge)

Harrison Avenue looking north
From the corner of Chestnut Street
Denver Public Library Special Collections
Call Number CHS.X4611

(Click image to enlarge)

The striped (red, white, blue bunting) telephone pole with at least ten pin cross arms, on the right side of the photograph above is the same striped pole seen to the right of the stereo-view photograph showing Soapy, at the top of this post. Examining and comparing the building fronts, roofs, facades and false fronts to the building fronts in the bird's eye view close-up shown above, clearly indicates that this photograph shows the approximate location of where Soapy had his picture taken.
I want to thank Gary Demoney for locating this photograph and others.

Visit the Soapy Smith Soap Box blog

Leadville, Colorado
Apr 30, 2010
Apr 04, 2011
Feb 14, 2012
Jun 03, 2013
Apr 23, 2017
Apr 13, 2020
Jul 21, 2021
Apr 14, 2023

Leadville, Colorado: pages 10, 36-37, 75, 77-78, 116, 123, 134-35, 144, 152, 176, 189, 192, 219, 225, 292, 297, 347, 349, 420, 509, 594.

"Until lions have their historians,
tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunters."

~African Proverb

August 21, 2023

Soapy Smith's "STAR" notebook, 1882: Part #8 - page 8

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 8 - original copy
1882

(Click image to enlarge)

OAPY SMITH'S "STAR" NOTEBOOK

Part #8 - page 8

     This is part #8 - page 8, the continuation of deciphering Soapy Smith's "star" notebook from the Geri Murphy's collection. A complete introduction to this notebook can be seen on page 1.
     The notebook(s) are in Soapy's handwriting, and often times pretty hard to decipher. A large part of this series of posts is to transcribe the pages, one-at-a-time, and receive help from readers on identifying words I am having trouble with, as well as correcting any of my deciphered words. I will include the original copy of each page, an enhanced copy of each page, a copy in negative, and a copy with typed out text, as tools to aid in deciphering the notes. There are a total of 24 pages. This means that there may be upwards of 24 individuals posts for this one notebook. Links to the past and future pages (pages 1, 2, 3, etc.) will be added at the bottom of each post for ease of research. When completed there will be a sourced partial record of Soapy's activities and whereabouts for 1882-1883.
     Important to note that the pages of the notebook do not appear to be in chronological order, with Soapy making additional notes on a town and topic several pages later.

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 8 - enhanced
1882
Courtesy of Geri Murphy

(Click image to enlarge)

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 8 - enhanced
1882
Courtesy of Geri Murphy

(Click image to enlarge)

Here is what I believe to be the correct deciphering of the text, dated 1882. Do you agree, or do you see something else? There are two words I have not been able to decipher positively. All comments, suggestions and ideas are welcome! I will update the new information to this post.

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 8 - deciphered
1882
Courtesy of Geri Murphy

Click image to enlarge

Page 8 (bottom).

Line 1: "Sherman Show [circus]"
Line 2: "Oregon City [Oregon] 29th"
Line 3: "__?__ 1882"
Line 4: "population 1,800"

Art Petersen, who has been aiding me in deciphering Soapy's handwriting, writes,

Lines 3 and 4; are conundrums for me. The name appears to have 4, 5, or 6 letters. Clearly appearing after the smudgy word are the #s 1882. The only letter that seems for sure is the last, an "o." Among possible Oregon cities, here are two nominations: Echo and Toledo. The next line, though, lists a population of 1,800. Neither of these towns in 1882 could have had a population that high. Of the two towns, my pick as possible is Echo. It was on the Oregon Trail, and Wikipedia indicates travelers were still known to be traversing "the trail" into the 1880s. So Echo was a known site that had a transient population for decades. Toledo, on the other hand, was a gold placer mining site; it was remote and went into decline sooner than Echo. This site for me remains the best possibility. The population listed, though, does seem high for 1882.
Line 5: "Salem [Oregon] pop. 5,000"
Line 6: "Albany [Oregon] 1,800 [pop.]"
Line 7: "Eugene City [Oregon] 1,117 [pop.]"
Line 8: "Lf"

Art writes,
Line 8; "Lf." The L in these two letters seems certainly an L, as comparison shows. No city in Oregon that begins with L has an f in it except Lafayette. Did Soapy begin to write that name, find himself unsure of the spelling, and left it, only to write it out a bit a later? No other thoughts occur to me about the two letters.
Line 9: "Hillsboro [Oregon] 600 [pop.]"
Line 10: "Lafayette [Oregon] 783 [pop.]"
Line 11: "Dalles [Oregon] 6200 [pop.]"
Line 12: "Corvallis [Oregon] 1,188 [pop.]"
Line 13: "Jacksonville [Oregon] 960 [pop.]"
Line 14: "Kalama [Washington Terr.] Aug 29, 1882"
Line 15: "fare from Olympia [Washington Terr.]"
Line 16: "to Portland [Oregon] 29 Aug"
Line 17: "1882 $6.80"

Art writes,
     The last 4 lines; may be related. The rather dark, clear letters appearing there seem to be KalamaeA[t?]ng. After it appear the following numbers: 291882. The # is not a sum total of the previous population numbers. Neither is it a reasonable population # for any location in the Northwest at the time. The possibility remaining is that the # contains 2 sets of #s—29 and 1882. That year is repeated 3 times on the page. If the last 4 digits are the year, 1882, that leaves the number 29. Now back to the word. Suggested is the Washington Territory town of Kalama. It's on the way from Portland to Tacoma, WA, and a spur reaches to Olympia. In 1880, after the Northern Pacific decided to put its headquarters, not in Kalama but in Tacoma, the Kalama population plunged to 129. It's not out of the realm of possibility that the town in 1882 had a population of about 29. Another possibility is that 29 is a date. In fact, it is repeated on the last two lines: 29 Aug / 1882. I have puzzled over the letters after the apparent Kalama and have come up empty. How could they fit with Kalama. Surrounding clues strongly suggest Kalama to me, but the A[t?]ng leave me stumped.
My response.
I believe that line 14 reads "Kalama [Washington Terr.] Aug 29, 1882."
Art writes,

     Line 15-16; Here's where the potential link to Kalama comes in. Recorded is "fare from Olympia to Portland." Kalama is on the way, 38 miles from Portland and 71.5 miles south of the Olympia.
      Line 17; A fare of $6.80. The southern spur of the Northern Pacific in 1882 ran from Portland, through Kalama and to Olympia with a short spur, and on to Tacoma. See the 1883 NPRR map.

Interpretation: Page 1, page 2, page 4, page 5 of this notebook shows Soapy's plans for traveling through Oregon and Washington Territory, making and changing plans before successfully venturing there, several times. Here in 1882, on page 8 he makes makes notations of Oregon and Washington towns and their populations, perhaps not wishing to stop and waste time at smaller communities. Details include traveling by train from Oregon to Washington, and returning to Portland, Oregon from Olympia, Washington, for $6.80, the equivalent of $211.96 in 2023.

Visit the Soapy Smith Soap Box blog

STAR NOTEBOOK
April 24, 2017
Part #1
Part #2
Part #3
Part #4
Part #5
Part #6
Part #7
Part #9
Part #10
Part #11
Part #12
Part #13
Part #14
Part #15
Part #16

Part #17
Part #18
Part #19

Part #20
Part #21
Part #22-23

Part #24

Oregon: pages 38-39, 42-43, 119, 166, 339, 440, 475, 499, 506, 530-31, 577.
Washington state: pages 443-44, 489, 498, 512, 518, 554, 579.

"Honesty is the best policy…unless you can tell a convincing lie."

—Keith C. Cobb
Exceptions to the Rules, 2001

August 15, 2023

Soapy Smith's "STAR" notebook, 1882: Part #7 - page 7

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 7 - original copy
1883

(Click image to enlarge)

THIS POST UPDATED
August 21, 2023

OAPY SMITH'S "STAR" NOTEBOOK

Part #7 - page7

This is part #7 - page 7, the continuation of deciphering Soapy Smith's "star" notebook from the Geri Murphy's collection. A complete introduction to this notebook can be seen on page 1.

The notebook(s) are in Soapy's handwriting, and often times pretty hard to decipher. A large part of this series of posts is to transcribe the pages, one-at-a-time, and receive help from readers on identifying words I am having trouble with, as well as correcting any of my deciphered words. I will include the original copy of each page, an enhanced copy of each page, a copy in negative, and a copy with typed out text, as tools to aid in deciphering the notes. There are a total of 24 pages. This means that there may be upwards of 24 individuals posts for this one notebook. Links to the past and future pages (pages 1, 2, 3, etc.) will be added at the bottom of each post for ease of research. When completed there will be a sourced partial record of Soapy's activities and whereabouts for 1882-1883.
Important to note that the pages of the notebook do not appear to be in chronological order, with Soapy making additional notes on a town and topic several pages later.

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 7 - enhanced
1883

Courtesy of Geri Murphy

Soapy Smith's "star" notebook
Page 7 - negative
1883
Courtesy of Geri Murphy

Here is what I believe to be the correct deciphering of the text. Do you agree, or do you see something else? There are two words I have not been able to decipher positively. All comments, suggestions and ideas are welcome! I will update the new information to this post.

Page 7 (bottom).

Line 1: "For license"
Line 2: "Tombstone City 12.50"
Line 3: "County [Cochise] 6.50"
Line 4: "Board one week 15.00"
Line 5: "[total] 34.00"
Line 6: "E B. [East Bound?] Dr [drive] to __?___"
Line 7: "To 7.00"
Line 8: "to 40 percent of"
Line 9: "15.00 6.00"
Line 10: "A watch 4.00"
Line 11: "[total] 17.00"

Interpretation: Soapy makes notations of his expenditures to and from Tombstone, Arizona, 1883. He note his purchases of a city license, a county (Cochise) license, and one weeks stay at an unknown hotel (December 17-22, 1883).
     Line #6: is where deciphering runs into a snag. On the previous page of the notebook (page 6) Art Petersen notes that "Soapy bought a ticket from San Francisco, CA, to El Paso, TX, for $60. He was riding the Southern Pacific, which in 1880 had reached Benson on its route east." Today, when traveling to Tombstone from Benson you take the AZ-80 East. Could "E B. dr to (can't read town name)" mean "east-bound drive to (can't read town name)?" Art believes it might be "Exit Benson drive to (can't read town name)."
   Line #7: appears to be cost "to" a destination for $7.00.
   Line #8 and #9: 40 percent of $15.00 is $6.00. Was this some sort of payoff?
     For lines #7-#9, Art Petersen believes "To reach Tombstone, Soapy had to take one of the several stages running from B. In leaving Tombstone, he calculated the cost of the drive back to Benson. It was $7, but in calculating that, he remembered that he had not yet accounted for the cost of the drive from Benson to Tombstone. There were several coaches in competition with one another at the time and always cutting their fares. The standard was was often cut to $4, $5, or $6, or $7. Soapy didn't remember what price he paid to Tombstone but he remembered the discount--40%, so he calculated that from the standard fare to find the $6 he paid. So he returned to Benson at some point presumably to continue his journey to El Paso, TX. He still had the rest of his ticket for travel.
   Line #10: He purchased a watch for $4.00.
   Line #11: Total expenses are $17.00

Close-up
undecipherable word
Page 7

Line 6 contains an undecipherable word that plagued me, so I posted close-up enlargement of it on some of the Tombstone history groups on Facebook, hoping someone might recognize the word as a place or name.
Previously, I thought it was the name of a place, but from every individual who responded, I received the following suggestions.

"JR"
"JRs"
"JR's"
"JP"
"JPs"
"JP's"
"IR"
"IRs"
"IR's"

It's a bit of a long shot, but could Soapy have sent his father ("JRS") $7? It is known that Soapy loved his father, but did not have a whole lot of respect for him. Perhaps he might have written "JRS" rather than "father?" It is known that his father wrote letters asking for money.
Art Peterson writes,

     I'm sorry to report that I remain puzzled. You provide some helpful comparison letters. Those took time to gather, showing you're as uncomfortable with the burden of the puzzle as I--probably more as you are the master puzzler of the notebook! Well, of all the comparison letters, I side with those who see JP. Soapy seems to drop the right leg off his Rs in a strong, vertical fashion whereas with a P, the line tends toward the horizontal. Today, the letter before the second suggest "Cl," but I have no idea what to do with those. Of the comparison letters, J seems closest to me--a hastily formed J.
     So what might JP stand for? In line with your payoff thought, JP could stand for Justice Peace. Or it could stand for some person, his initials. I looked again at all the towns around Tombstone; none suggests the letters in question.
     I also read the stagecoach history again to see if one of the names of the several owners of stage lines might be related. No. The article, Stage Coach Lines gives an interesting transportation picture of the region.
     Young Soapy at that time wanted to keep track of his costs. He lists the ticket from SF. He records a benchmark, being in LA. He records his basic costs in Tombstone City. It makes sense to me that he would record the cost of travel from Benson to Tombstone, and the $7 one way is in line with the fare about that time. His wanting to keep track of his costs keeps dragging me back to interpreting the $7 & $6 as the cost of transport over the 24 miles between Benson & Tombstone. If those costs or one of them is not for transport, why would he leave the cost out? There could be an explanation, of course--that he let the driver make a "sure thing" bet with him for the ride and the driver lost, making the $6 for something else, maybe for what you say, a payoff. Could be you're going to have to leave this line in an unknown state, the worst kind for a puzzler.
     Seems to me you've made a worthy effort on this line. Maybe time to move on. When it comes time to put together a transcription of the whole (which would make a very interesting read since it seems to be pretty much chronological and makes a narrative), there'll be opportunity to look back with fresh eyes.

I have to agree with Art. I could guess, but with so many choices I don't see it fair to history to "decide." I leave it for a future time.

THANK YOU ART PETERSEN FOR YOUR SKILLS IN
DECIPHERING AND RATIONALE

Visit the Soapy Smith Soap Box blog