February 14, 2012

Soapy Smith Days: Leadville, Colorado

Soapy Smith leads the charge!
Spanish-American War 1898
(fantasy piece by Jeff Smith)



Last year (April) I told you about Soapy Smith Days in Leadville, Colorado. This summer was to be the first annual event. The Leadville Assembly was planning on doing the Soapy Days this coming April, but because of the national exposure on the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic they decided to go with that instead, however, that is for this year only. From my sources I understand that the Assembly is "still pumped about a Soapy Smith Days, especially when Leadville got the State of Colorado to formally declare Leadville as the city for April History Month!

The city is now deciding whether to do the Soapy Smith event next April, or on another weekend in the summer. Here's the website for the Titanic event to give you some idea of how they do these "events."




FEBRUARY 14
1884: Soapy Smith is arrested in San Francisco for operating the prize package soap racket.


Jeff Smith









.

February 13, 2012

A new photo of Soapy Smith?

Pacific Hotel & Sample Room
Skagway, Alaska 1898



My friend Gary "Gritscafe" on eBay has been selling Alaskan artifacts that were found in Keller’s Drug Store of Skagway, Alaska among a Case and Draper collection that is dated from the late 1800's to the early 1900's. The building that Keller used for the Drug Store was originally the Case and Draper Photo Studio. Some of the items he has found were related to Soapy Smith and I have show cased them here.

The photograph at the top is a nice original 4 1/4" by 6 1/2" sepia photo of the Pacific Hotel and Sample Room of Skagway, Alaska. There are 8 men posing for the picture. Gary writes that one of the men looks like Soapy Smith? What do you think?



Gary was kind enough to send me an enlarged digital copy of the photograph so that I could have a look at the man who may be Soapy. I gave him the following opinion.
Hi, Gary.
Thanks for the opportunity to look at the photograph closer. I can't really say one way or the other. It could be him, and it may not be. The man in the photograph is wearing what looks like a derby. The only known photographs of Soapy in Skagway show him wearing a light colored, wide brimmed sombrero style hat that was common with many of the stampeders. Did he have different hats? We don't know. His clothes in the known photographs were the standard dark business suit style. I hope this helps.
Time and again, Gary has proven himself to be an honest man. This sale is no exception. He is not saying this IS Soapy, but merely saying it "looks like Soapy." I admire that. The photograph is up for auction as of this post and you can find it HERE.









Gary "Gritscafe"
April 1, 2010, October 26, 2009, December 22, 2008

 

Jeff Smith









.

February 8, 2012

Denver memorial to Soapy Smith

Sidewalk memorial to Soapy Smith
17 and Larimer
Denver, Colorado
(photograph by Dave Elstun)



In 2009 I was made aware of a Soapy memorial plaque in Denver, Colorado by a friend. I have since found out more about it. It is 18" diameter and located on the sidewalk, near the curb on the southwest corner of 17th and Larimer Streets. The inscription on the plaque reads as follows.
In the 1880s and 1890s Denver was the nation's headquarters for "con" men, a dubious honor that it maintained into the early years of the 20th century.

The most famous con man was "Soapy" Smith who sold $5.00 bars of soap from 17th Street, claiming that some had one hundred dollar bills inside the wrappers. (Marker Number 17.)
The GPS coordinates for the plaque are 39° 45′ N, 104° 59.771′ W. I added the marker onto the Historical Marker database website where there are the following Soapy Smith related markers listed.









June 24, 2009



Jeff Smith









.

February 7, 2012

Soapy Smith's swindles: the bucket shop

The Bucket Shop
1892




One of the more complex in-store confidence swindles Soapy invested his time in, and that I have not really went into great detail here on this blog is the fake stock exchange, known commonly as the bucket shop. In the 1890s it was known by con men as the store or up and down. In his writings Soapy referred to it as the exchange, and according to one of his gangsters the establishment was so popular that steerers, to bring people into the place, were not needed.

There are several theories why the term "bucket shop" is used. Some definitions state that the name derives from the bucket used to catch the incoming ticker tape, as shown in a photograph below. John Philip Quinn has a different theory in his book, Fools of Fortune published in 1890. Explaining a bucket shop in a few words is no easy task Quinn's book includes one of the best, although long, descriptions I've read that thoroughly illustrates what the bucket shops were all about and they operated.

~~~~~~~~~~
These institutions are peculiar to American cities. The more phlegmatic temperament of the denizens of the old world does not lead him into the vagaries of the citizen of the “great Republic," where wealth fixes caste, and gold is too often worshiped in the place of God. In the United States, more than in any other country, activity, mental as well as physical, is regarded as the chief end of man. In fact, a rocking chair under full swing, would be no inappropriate heraldic national emblem. It is true, as a German paper says of us, that we “chew more tobacco and burst more steam engines than any other nation on earth." With us, life is restless, and we can find recreation only in excitement. It is this feature of our national character that inclines us to gaming and to speculation in a far higher degree than any other people. Could it be eliminated from our nature the “bucket shop," like Othello, would find its occupation gone.

Yet the reader, the lines of whose quiet life are cast outside the whirl and turmoil of a great city, may not understand the signification of the term. A "bucket shop" is an establishment where those whose inclinations prompt them to speculate in stocks or produce, but the scantiness of whose means forbids their operating on an extensive scale, may gratify their tastes by risking (and losing) the few dollars which they can ill afford to spare. The epithet" bucket" is a term of derision, having been originally applied to such an institution to imply that a customer might buy or sell a “bucketful" of any commodity which he might select.

These concerns differ only in respect of size and appointment. They are all conducted on one and the same principle. The visitor, on entering, finds himself within a large room, sometimes handsomely, sometimes meanly furnished. Rows of chairs are arranged for the convenience of customers and chance-comers, facing a blackboard. The latter is the indispensible [sic] requisite, the sine qua non, without which the transaction of business would be practically impossible. In these chairs are seated men of every age and of nearly all grades of social distinction. Clerks, artisans, merchants and men about town mingle in a sort of temporary companionship, truly democratic. Beardless youths sit side by side with men whose heads have grown bald and whose step has become feeble in a vain chase after a phantom, a chimera, a will-of-the-wisp, always just, within the grasp, yet ever eluding the clutch. Here may be met the confidential clerk, who sees nothing wrong in following, at a respectable distance, the example of his employer, who ventures his thousands upon the floor of 'Change. Here one jostles against the decrepit old man, once a millionaire, but who having sunk his fortune in the maelstrom of some great Board of Trade, now passes his waking hours before these blackboards, reckoning that a red-letter day upon which he wins five dollars. And here, too, may be encountered the successful business man, keen of eye, quick of step, alert of perception, who has been drawn hither partly through a desire for speedy wealth, partly through an inordinate craving for the excitement which is not to be found in the legitimate walks of trade. The eyes of all are turned toward the immense board on which, chalk in hand, some attache of the establishment momentarily records some change in quotations of stocks or grain. and which seems to have for them all the fascination of the candle for the moth.

Bucket shop of
Clement, Parker and Co.
Note the "buckets" catching the ticker tape on the far left
(courtesy of The JetSetRnv8r)


Far different is the scene here presented from that witnessed on the floor of the great Exchange. There all was clamor and apparent confusion; here quiet and decorum reign supreme. The silence is unbroken, save by the sharp tick of the telegraphic instrument and the droning monotone of the blackboard marker. Yet there is one point of resemblance between the habitues of the" bucket shop." the dealers upon 'Change and the patrons of the gaming hell; one and all, they win without displaying exultation and lose without manifesting regret. In the" bucket shops," however, the attentive observer may sometimes hear the heavy sigh of dispair from the young man who has been tempted to risk his employer's money, as he perceives the last dollar of his margin swept away by an unlucky turn of prices; or witness a senile smile of satisfaction momentarily gleam upon the face of the feeble old man who sees himself about to be provided with the means of keeping soul and body together for another day. 0, wretched picture of sordid greed, of fallacious hopes, of blank despair! 0, sad illustration of the sadder truth that in the contact for the mastery of the heart of man, the evil too often outstrips the good!

But let us examine into the business methods of the proprietors of these resorts where gambling is made easy, and ruin is placed within reach of the humblest. As an illustration, let us suppose that the customer wishes to speculate in some stock, say Missouri, Kansas and Texas. The blackboard shows the fluctuations in quotations as they occur on the New York Stock Exchange. The margin which he is called upon to advance, is one dollar per share, and he may limit his transactions to five shares, if he sees fit. It is a matter of indifference to the proprietor whether he elects to buy or sell; that obliging individual will accommodate himself to his wishes, whatever they may be. Suppose that he buys five shares of the stock in question, at a moment when it is quoted at 16-1/4. If it rises to 17-1/4 he may, if he chooses, close his deal, receiving back the five dollars which he advanced as margin, together with another five dollars, the latter representing his profit. If, on the other hand, it drops to 15-1/4, he loses his margin. It is easy to see that such a transaction as this is nothing but a bet, pure and simple.

The illustration given above is drawn from the smallest description of business done. Yet, as has been said, these dens of iniquity are patronized by the wealthy merchant, as well as by the poor mechanic and clerk. It is on the poorer class of customers that the proprietors depend for their steady income; it is from the wealthier customers that they obtain sums of money which they denominate "plums."

The manner in which such traders are fleeced by the unscrupulous scoundrels who conduct these institutions may be illustrated as follows: One of them will inform a confiding patron that he has received information from a source which he regards as trustworthy, that some inactive stock-perhaps Denver & Rio Grande-then selling at 9, is about to rise. At his suggestion his customer purchases, let us say, 15,000 shares on a margin of one dollar per share. This done, the proprietor of the "bucket shop" telegraphs to a broker to "sell 3,000 D. & R. G.-quick, quick," in blocks from 8U to 8. The broker who receives the dispatch, either alone or with assistance, offers the stock; the offer is promptly accepted by another broker, to whom the wily manager has telegraphed instructions to buy the stock at the price named. The final quotation, 8, fixes the price, and the sale is promptly reported to the bucket shop by telegraph. The result is that the too trustful customer's $15,000 advanced as margin, is swept into the coffers of the daring rascal who has perpetrated the fraud, and whose only outlay is the payment of one-fourth of a cent commission on the fictitious sale and, purchase.


Bucket shop of
Haight and Freese, New York
(courtesy of Financial Spread Betting)


Let us take another illustration, drawn from a suppositious transaction in wheat. The speculator perceives from the quotations on the blackboard that some future delivery of wheat opened at 86-1/8. Every minute or two new quotations are shown on the board, the apparent tendency of the market being upward. He also sees that during the preceding hour the price has been as high as 86-5/8, and as low as 86. When it touches 86 again he concludes to buy, guessing that it is likely to rise. Accordingly he purchases 1,000 bushels at that price, advancing ten dollars as a margin. Perhaps the next change is an advance to 86-1/8. He might now sell out without loss, as the 7/8 in his favor amounts to exactly the commission charged by the shop. The next quotation is, say 86, and the following one 85-7/8. If it should continue to fall until 85-1/8 is touched, he is said to be "frozen out," inasmuch as the decline of 7/8 added to the 7/8 brokerage charged by the proprietor, equals the ten dollars which he has advanced. Perhaps he concludes to "re•margin," in which case he will put up ten dollars more. Possibly the market may now take an upward turn and rise until 86-1/8 is again reached. It is now within his power to close the transaction without loss other than that involved in the payment of the commissions. Let us suppose that he does so. It is quite probable that it will now occur to him that the market is likely again to recede, and he accordingly sells 1,000 bushels at 86-1/8, once more advancing ten dollars as a margin. If the price continues to rise until 87 is reached, our venturesome speculator is again frozen out, and is ten dollars lighter in pocket.

The above supposed cases are fair illustrations of the average bucket shop trading. A majority of the patrons of these establishments are “scalpers," satisfied if they can win five, ten, or twenty dollars, and close observers say that fully seven out of ten guess the market wrong. The shop always makes its regular commission, no matter what may be the result of the transaction. " Puts," "calls" and "straddles" are also sold at these places, although, of course on a far smaller scale than by members of the regular exchanges.

But bucket shops have other and darker sides. It is by no means uncommon for a manager so to manipulate quotations as to wipe out speculators margins at his own pleasure. Thus, if it is for his interest that a certain stock or commodity should decline, the quotations which he posts upon his blackboard show a fall, without reference to the actual course of the market at the regular exchanges.

Jeff's Bucket Shop?
(Actually this is a Karaoke place)


Another, and favorite, device of the gentry, by which large sums are often realized, is to "fail." A considerable amount of money-say $50,000 or $60,000--having been received as margins, and being carried by the house, a plan is formed by which it may be absorbed by the proprietor with but little chance of detection. In order to accomplish this he has resort to the aid of some reputable (?) firm of brokers, who are members in good standing, of some regular exchange. He arranges with them to enter in their books, records of fictitious transactions with him of such a character and to such an amount that he may appear to have lost the money in speculating, for the benefit of his customers, upon ‘Change. The obliging firm of brokers receive, for rendering this valuable service, the regular commission of one-eighth of one cent per bushel upon the transactions thus fraudulently entered. It is, in itself, a striking commentary upon the methods and morals of the average, commercial exchange of the last quarter of the nineteenth century, that brokers can be found, who, while claiming to be upright, honorable business men, are willing, for so paltry a consideration to outrage integrity, and drag honor in the dust.
~~~~~~~~~~










Jan. 07, 2009










Bucket shop: pages 71, 109-10.




Jeff Smith









.

February 2, 2012

Soapy Smith sculpture by Edward J. Hawkins, 1953.

Artist, E. J. Hawkins puts finishing touches on his
Soapy Smith sculpture intended for display in Creede, Co.
(photo: Courtesy of Denver Public Library - Western History/Genealogy Dept.)



In April 2010 on this blog, and recently on Facebook, I posted the story of a sculpture of Soapy Smith that has never surfaced all these years. I assumed that it might be sitting somewhere in some unknown art museum, a private collection, or even someone's home. 

On Facebook I placed the photograph (seen at top of page) and questioned the location of the artwork on the page for the Denver Library Western History/Genealogy Department. James Rogers, the Senior Librarian contacted me and after researching the piece, sent me the following newspaper clipping  



Rocky Mountain News
January 25, 1953

Mining Town Remembers Robin Hood Sort of Man
Soapy Smith to Get Pedestal in Creede.
By Wes French

Soapy Smith, the Colorado version of Robin Hood and Deadeye Dick rolled into one, will soon have his grizzled face peering down the main street of Creede, the mining he loved so well.

The likeness and spirit of this fabled Western character has been captured by a Denver sculptor, Edward J. Hawkins.

FUNDS ARE SOUGHT TO PAY FOR BUST

The ball is rolling in Creede now to gather funds to finance casting of the bust which Mr. Hawkins created, to transport the finished work to Creede and mount it on a pedestal in the Mineral County mining community.

Soapy was born in Georgia in 1860. He spent his early life in Texas as a cowpoke where he carried the proud name of Jefferson Randolph Smith.

Shortly after Soapy’s arrival in Denver, he earned the nickname which he carried until his death in Skagway, Alaska in 1898.

Picking 17th St., as his “beat,” Soapy set up a portable stand and sold soap to cowboys at $5 a bar. Before his audiences, he wrapped bills ranging from $5 to $100 in some bars of soap and began the sale.

ONLY SOAPY’S CRONIES HIT THE JACKPOT

He did a land-office business, but buyers who hit the jackpot were members of Soapy’s gang.

Soapy had an understanding with the police that he would fleece only out-of-towners.

When the silver mines opened in Creede, Soapy and his gang headed for the mining town. Within a few days Soapy was boss of the town and he and his boys “policed” affairs.

HE MADE MORE CASH WITH THE ‘PREHISTORIC MAN’

One of his famous Creede episodes was the “finding” of a prehistoric man in one of his diggings.

The stone man was placed on display in Creede and for five years Soapy collected admission charges.

At the end of that time Soapy sold the stone man to a Washington buyer for $2500. The buyer later discovered his prehistoric specimen was made of plaster and cement.

Soapy was kind-hearted as well as nimble-minded. Running across an illiterate preacher one day, Soapy decided the town needed a church. He raised funds for the building in an afternoon and later he and his men attended services, seeing that the congregation contributed enough to keep the church financed.

SOAPY SMITH DECIDES TO LEAVE CREEDE

After the killing in Creede of Bob Ford, slayer of Jesse James, the town began to develop official law enforcement methods. Then, when silver prices took a tumble, Soapy decided to move on.

He returned to Denver for a time, then left for Skagway. He encountered the same situation there he had in Creede and repeated his Colorado operations.

Finally in 1898, law and order came to Skagway and Soapy was killed during a battle between opposing forces.

SOAPY SMITH FETE PLANNED FOR SUMMER

The monument to Soapy is being constructed with the idea of creating further tourist interest in Creede. Plans are in motion to establish a Soapy Smith Festival during the summer months.

Among Creede people who are working on the project are Mrs. Mary Thom, unofficially heading the committee; Gene McClure, John Dabney, Bill Jackson and Orie K. Hargraves.

There is no evidence that the sculpture ever made it to Creede. It was suggested from looking at the photograph that the bust was still in clay form and thus possibly never completed. My heart sank at the thought but I had to know for sure. Friends members, like Steve Stapp, believed that the photo showed a finished product while others did not think so. I contacted several foundries and received an even number of those who felt it had been bronzed and those who thought it was still in its clay composition.

I decided to contact friend and artist, Kym Younger, for her expertise. She stated that "if the project was cancelled, the probability of there ever having been a mold taken is slim. In this situation, the clay was probably recycled and used for another project. The only hope you have is that it did get molded, and, that the mold wasn't broken when the project was cancelled on the artist." Considering the odds that Creede never received it, my heart sank even lower, but I had to be sure. I sent Kym a good scan of the above photograph and she sent back her detailed and educated opinion.



Picture #2

Hi jeff - the tool, although staged, is a clay tool. I have three shots that intrigue me -

Picture 2 - I zoomed in on the lower left (as the eye sees in the picture) of the base - above "Jefferson" you will note dark spots on the base - this indicates water to me - and, clay must be kept damp at all times and covered when not being worked into. The neck above also reveals a hatching pattern - which is a "nearing-final" state in a sculpt before it is smoothed to a finish for the final mold to be lifted from - and, given that this period of time produced bronze busts that were usually smooth and not textured, I would lay good money on this still be in the raw form and not finalized.

As for the lettering - if you look at it closely in the enlarged picture # 2 - you will see it is not even in height or width or cut - this is not a machined finish, nor, would it have been on a bust being done in the time period associated with this piece of work. There are other flaws elsewhere in these that let me believe this is a less than final work and still in clay.

Picture #3

Picture # 3 - the collar and left shoulder - again, the cross hatching - now, that may be there to represent the fabric in the coat, and, if so, it has a purpose in the use in the sculpt. However, there is a wide variance in color range - which reads to be moist areas of clay that are wetter than others. And, the grey color of the overall piece is far different than a final bronze cast - with, or without, patina - would appear in a black and white picture. There is a definite tactile appearance that metal gives that is not resident in this picture.

Also in this, you will note that the coat collar has a definite undercut line to it. This is something that would tend to appear in a presentation piece in clay. The reason for this is that undercuts are horrid for a mold to be pulled from. The usual practice in a sculpt that has undercuts or pieces that do not present themselves for an easy one-piece mold to be taken is to have to cut the clay sculpt apart and then mold those pieces separately - and then mount the final wax pours together before investing for the casting. And, some pieces are so difficult that they are actually cast in bronze separately and then welded together and smoothed into the final piece...prior to the patina being applied.

That collar undercut would (I tend to believe) be made smooth and linear as a surface before going to molding for making the master to cast from due to the reasons given above. Another reason I believe this is clay.

Picture #1

I come to Picture #1 next - there are still a lot of undercuts on the face and around the eyelids. Especially notable on the left eye. This would be a smooth transition before casting. The inset eye itself is traditional to sculpts. The close up reveals also what seems to be a large amount of clay irregularities - the harder bits of soil that didn't get mashed enough when the clay mix was made - and those add a texture to the working medium that really take a good effort to smooth out for the final cast - having seen enough raw clays this is another sign to me that we are probably looking at an initial study piece in the raw sculpt form.
If you look at the top of the hat brim, you will find the most interesting item in the picture to me. It is a small stamped image. And, that brings us to Picture #4...

Picture #4

Picture # 4 - That is an artist's stamp. I would lay 99% factor on that. And, that comes from a die that the sculptor has made to mark their work with as a signature. Not all sculptors do that, mind you, but, the instructor's I knew in school all had their die on their presentation works (clay sculpts) when they presented them for bids.

The other thing that is really glaring wrong about this - the die stamp is dead center in the hat brim. If this were a finished piece, that is not where an artist would place their mark of creation. A signature or mark would be on the back of the base or somewhere else that would not distract from the overall picture on view to the public. This is like a flood-light that is glaring into your eyes and does not belong in that location on a finished and cast sculpt, period.

However - that may also give you a clue to work from. If you can track down the sculptor by records or pictures of who he is, or, by the recorded stamp used, you might be able to, at the least, know who this artist was.

Hope that helps you a bit more along the way.
All the best – Kym

Although nothing is certain, I feel that the search for this mysterious, wonderful sculpture is completed. Thank goodness a reporter at the Rocky Mountain News took a photograph of the sculpture. One of the foundries I contacted said that they could make a full size bronze based on the photograph and any others I might care to send them. Any ideas of what we could do with such a piece? There are actually online fund raisers that we could utilize if the idea was worthy enough...   


Jeff Smith









.

February 1, 2012

Nymph in a web: Parlor art.

Soapy Smith and the print on the wall

March 4, 2011



I have always found the decor inside Jeff Smith's Parlor in Skagway, Alaska of great interest. Each picture hung on the walls had meaning and where there for a reason. The ones on the west wall, behind the front bar are the most telling, patriotic propaganda during the Spanish-American War. Soapy was a very patriotic man, every known photograph of his saloons in Colorado and Alaska have American flags and red, white, and blue bunting. In Skagway the various pictures behind the bar changed with each photo session. Surely they served Soapy's end of signing up volunteers for his private army, the Skaguay Military Company. But what about the pictures on the side and back walls? Was there any meaning in them, or were they simply hung for the purpose of decor?

One framed picture has been of interest to me, and that is the one that hung on the east wall, opposite the front bar wall. In the photograph above you can see it directly behind Soapy's head. The details are lacking but it appeared to me to be some nudes, which naturally interested me even more. I searched and compared thousands of artworks in online art shops hoping to find a match but could not. I had pretty much given up, thinking that the photograph perhaps was showing shadow and light glare and what I perceived as a nude, was in reality, a shadow streak or light reflection in the frame glass.

Saloon nude?


The other day I stumbled, completely by accident, onto the painting and today I am happy to publish that find, thanks to eBay. One day while searching through my daily eBay saved searches I came across a postcard of what appeared to look like a typical saloon painting of a reclining nude female. In fact, it was Russian art from the 1890s. I love saloon nudes so I noted that the postcard was in the category of "risque art." There are over 10,000 works to look at and thus far I have found nearly 60 pieces that look very much like saloon nudes, much like the one just above.

As I was looking through the thousands of "risque" works I landed on one that immediately looked familiar. It did not take but a second to realize that I had found the missing artwork I had been searching for.


Nymph in a Web
by Le Quesue


"Welcome to my parlor," said the spider to the fly.

I found the painting but the information about it is sketchy. The painting is either called Nude Nymph in Net or Nude Nymph in Spider Web, by Russian artist Le Quesue or Le Queysen. This information comes from the two eBay dealers who are selling the postcard copies of the print. I used every bit of information they had and could not find anything about the artist or the painting online. Is it pure coincidence that the painting shows victims caught in a web, just as victims to Soapy's swindles were caught? Perhaps someone who knows the answers to this mysterious painting and artist can help?








FEBRUARY 1
1886: Jefferson Randolph Smith II and Mary Eva Noonan exchange wedding vows.

Jeff Smith









.

January 27, 2012

Film footage of the White Pass Trail and the building of the railroad




Friends of Bad Man Soapy Smith member Steve sent me the following YouTube video about the building of the White Pass and Yukon Railway. There is film footage of stampeders using the trails before and during the railroad construction. I have never seen most of this before so I thought some of you might enjoy it.











JANUARY 27
1896: George McAttee, alias “Jimmy Blaine” member of the Denver Soap Gang, collapses and dies in a Cripple Creek, Colorado restaurant.
1899: A granite memorial is completed replacing the wooden grave marker for Frank H. Reid, mortally wounded by Soapy Smith in the shootout on Juneau wharf.

Jeff Smith









.

January 26, 2012

He Died To Save Skagway (part 2): A review.

Jeff Smith's private Soapy Smith museum



Back on January 20, 2012 I posted part one of my article review, He Died To Save Skagway. I do this thanks to Bob "Buckshot" Bradley who has supplied me with the pdf format pages from his personal collection. I have to admit that this article has been the 2nd most pleasurable article to review. Author, Cy Martin published several books on the White Pass & Yukon Railway and Skagway so he had pretty good access to some of the older books on that history and nearly all of them included something on Soapy Smith. Please enjoy part two.






He Died to Save Skagway (Part 2) Real West April 1968



Page 38
  • (Text above photograph) "Frank Reid is forgotten but his headstone is still unblemished. That tiny stone marker is the only reminder of a man who sacrificed his life to save Skagway." With all the books and articles that author Cy Martin has written on Skagway I find it hard to believe that he never paid the cemetery a visit, if not the town. Anyone who has been to that cemetery since 1900 will see that Frank Reid's memorial (see page 41 in this article above) is huge!
  • Paragraph 1: Cy writes that Soapy was a "small-time bad man from Colorado mining camps." Soapy was definitely not small-time. My book, Alias Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel, gives a ton of provenance that Soapy was big-time. In fact, another post on this blog (January 23, 2012) shows that Soapy was more well known than Wyatt Earp while the two men were alive. I know of no small-time bad men, or good men for that matter, that can claim the same!
  • Paragraph 3: There is no provenance that the man was a member of the Soap Gang.   
Page 39
  • Paragraph 9: I would like to credit Cy for correctly naming Soapy's opposing organization to the 101, as the 317. So many early biography's made the common mistake of calling it the 303 (exactly three times larger than the 101). This article was written in 1968 but even the well researched 1961 biography, Soapy Smith: King of the Frontier Con Men by Frank Robertson and Beth Harris made the 303 mistake. As a side note, the number 317 is the address of Jeff Smith's Parlor, one of Soapy's saloons.
  • Paragraph 11: The July 4 parade is still somewhat of a mystery as there are no known newspapers existing that cover the event. Many old residents said that Soapy led the parade as grand marshal. Newspapers previous to the parade list him as grand-marshal of the 4th division. There are no accounts from old-timers stating Soapy was at the end of the parade and there are several theories that he made his way to the front, but that is a post for another day. No matter, in the parade he was followed by the volunteers of his private army, the Skaguay Military Company, as well as a float containing a caged live eagle named "Gen. Lee Fitzhugh" after the famed Spanish-American War general.
  • Paragraph 15: John Douglas Stewart, the man robbed by the Soap Gang had $2,600 in gold dust, according to the court trial records. That amount is the equivalent of $84,832.79 in today's market!
  • Paragraph 16: The two gang members who befriended Stewart were John L. Bowers and "Slim Jim" Foster. They took Stewart towards Jeff Smith's Parlor where they met up with gang member Van B. Triplett who introduced the three-card monte game that was played and lost by Stewart previous to having his gold poke stolen away from him.
  • Paragraph 17: The robbery actually took place outside the Parlor in an adjacent alley.   
Page 40
  • (Photograph of Soapy's grave marker) This marker shown was metal and hideous. In 1997 I had a reproduction of the original grave marker (in my possession) made and placed on Soapy's grave.
  • Paragraph 1-9: The details that Cy wrote differ a little, but not my much, to what actually occurred. What actually took place can be found, with plenty of provenance, inside the pages of my book.
  • Paragraph 10: There is no other mention anywhere that I've seen that Frank Reid went to Jeff Smith's Parlor to see Soapy. Reid was only a guard the night of the shootout. He was not a leader of the vigilante organization as many old versions like to portray.
  • Paragraph 14: The "I've got 500 men behind me" speech is actually credited to the incident five months previous when bartender John Fay shot the deputy U.S. marshal (another great story).
  • Paragraph 16: Soapy was not a "rare drinker." There are numerous accounts in Colorado in which he indulged a little too much and caused a little hilarity and sometimes trouble.
  • Paragraph 19: Although Samuel Graves added interesting facts to the shootout on Juneau Wharf (Wikipedia page about the fight) his words are far from "the most accurate and factual account..."
  • Paragraph 25: "Reid was the only man Soapy Smith ever feared." Not one piece of provenance covers this statement.
  • Paragraph 26: Reid and Tanner were not known as the leaders of the vigilante movement, except in later published articles and books.
Page 41
  • Paragraph 10: Soapy's partner, John Clancy also was at Soapy's grave. There is no information on "Soapy's mistress" as this is the only mention of her.
  • Paragraph 11: The amount missing from Stewart's gold was $600, believed to have been the amount paid to Deputy U.S. Taylor as graft, not to take action in regards to the robbery.
  • Paragraph 12: There is no accounting as to how much Soapy had on his corpse when he died. He was obviously robbed of that amount. What is reported is that his assets were worth $148.60 after subtraction of inquest fees. There is numerous information that Soapy had made millions in Skagway during his reign, most of it being robbed by those he had keeping it in Skagway, Seattle, and San Francisco.
  • Paragraph 13-14: Although his marker gives the age of 38 Soapy was born November 2, 1860 which makes him 37 at the time of his death.
  • Paragraph 20: Soapy has had a total of 5 markers over his grave. The history of those markers can be viewed on the main website here.




JANUARY 26
1883: “Big Ed” Burns, member of the Soap Gang, is arrested in Denver. Burns eventually followed Soapy to Alaska in 1897-98.



Jeff Smith










.

January 23, 2012

Was Soapy Smith more well known than Wyatt Earp? Comparison #2




Was Soapy Smith more well known than Wyatt Earp?

I first posed that question, backed with graphs from Google newspaper archives, here in October 2010. The answer is that while the two men were both alive Soapy was indeed more well known across the nation than Wyatt Earp.

Recently, while researching with Gale Primary Source Media and Archival Solutions and their huge western states nineteenth century newspaper archives I decided to do the comparison again, using the same method to compare the number of newspaper articles that mentioned Wyatt Earp to those that mentioned Soapy Smith, between the dates 01/01/1860 - 12/31/1899. Once again Soapy beat out Wyatt, by 210% Wyatt's score is 164 while Soapy won with 345. This being the second comparison, and with such a large difference, I feel it is safe to make the comment. Just don't do so in front of hard-core Wyatt Earp fans.

Jeff Smith









.

January 20, 2012

He Died To Save Skagway (part 1): A review.

He Died To Save Skagway



Today I'd like to bring you another article review from an old issue of Real West magazine. I can do this thanks to Bob "Buckshot" Bradley who has supplied me with the pdf format pages from his personal collection. I have to admit that this article has been the 2nd most pleasurable article to review. Author, Cy Martin published several books on the White Pass & Yukon Railway and Skagway so he had pretty good access to some of the older books on that history and nearly all of them included something on Soapy Smith.  Following the article is my review. I hope you enjoy both.






He Died to Save Skagway (Part 1) Real West Jan 1968




Page 16
  • Comment above photograph: Mr. Martin writes that the photograph was taken in April 1898. The fact is that although some of the photographs have been etched with the date of July 4, 1898, we do not know for certain the exact dates of the three inside photographs taken inside Soapy's saloon, Jeff Smith's Parlor. We do know all three were taken on different dates as the pictures and decor hanging on the walls differ. Being that May 1 and July 4, 1898 were huge celebrations for Soapy it is a good guess that at least one of the photographs was taken on May 1 and at least one was taken on July 4, 1898.   
  • Paragraph 3: Mr. Martin incorrectly dates the robbery of John Stewart as July 6. The correct date is July 8, 1898.
  • Paragraph 4: Martin incorrectly lists the weapons Soapy had on his person. He mentions a dagger but there is no evidence he had a knife of any kind on his person. Martin writes of a .45 Colt revolver. There is a photograph of Soapy's corpse in the morgue with a double-action revolver which appears to be a model 1892 .41 DA Army revolver. Martin writes that the Winchester Soapy carried to the shootout on Juneau Wharf was a .30-30 when in reality it was a .44-40. That rifle is still in the possession of the Smith family. At the end of the paragraph he talks about running into some citizens on his walk to the Juneau Wharf and how Soapy told them to chase themselves "home to bed." This confrontation actually happened earlier in the evening. There is no evidence that Soapy confronted any citizens during his walk towards the wharf.
  • Paragraph 6: Martin states that a "dozen or so" of the gang followed behind Soapy. The number is closer to 7 or 8.
  • Paragraph 7: Martin is correct in his reporting of this supposed meeting. However, I do not believe it took place. There was a cover-up involving the Clancy brothers, John and Frank and I believe this was just one of the contrived fables to make it appear that John was nor privy to what was going on. The whole story is found in my book, Alias Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel.
Page 17
  • Paragraph 4: Martin states that Frank Reid was standing "100 feet from the dock." Frank Reid was actually about 60 feet into the wharf.
  • Paragraph 5-6: Martin copies what many of the older biographies published as to what Smith and Reid said to one another, but the truth of the matter is that none of the 3 other guards present could fully hear the discussion and none could agree as to what was said.
  • Paragraph 9-10: Soapy could not have shot Reid in the groin in his first shot. Once Reid was hit in the groin he fell and most likely could not have possibly fired another shot intentionally. At least five wounds were received by both men. The debate continues as to what order those wounds were received.
  • Paragraph 13: Martin follows the well worn legend of the gunfight. In 1968 when Martin wrote this article there were very few people who knew what actually occurred. Even in Skagway many of the residents only knew of the story that another man had possibly shot Soapy but few knew his name. My book covers this story in great detail, including the account that Jesse Murphy, one of the four guards on the wharf was the killer of Smith.
  • Paragraph 14-16: Martin correctly includes the comment of Samuel Graves, taken from his book, On the White Pass Payroll (1908). 
Page 49
  • Paragraph 1-8: The continuation of comments taken from Samuel Graves' book, On the White Pass Payroll. Interesting to note that Graves is one of the few published works that includes Jesse Murphy's actions during the shootout, but stops just short of mentioning that Murphy pointed the rifle at Soapy and shot him dead. Again my book covers this in detail, including Murphy's actions to gain credit for the killing as well as correspondence from J. M. Tanner, one of the four guards on the wharf, naming Murphy as the killer and not Reid.
  • Paragraph 20: Martin writes that Soapy was proud of his alias ("Soapy"). This is not true. It might have amused him when it was first used but it quickly became synonymous with "criminal" and Soapy did not like to be referred to as one who was against society. His friends called him "Jeff." In a few rare instances he signed a letter or two with "Soapy," to instill fear.
  • Paragraph 21: Martin writes that Soapy arrived in the "fall of 1897." Soapy actually arrived in Skagway August 22, 1897 (summer).
Page 50
  • Paragraph 1: Martin states that the name of Soapy's saloon was Jeff's Place or Jeff Smith's Oyster Parlor. That one saloon was named Jeff. Smith's Parlor. The period after "Jeff" meant that it was short for "Jefferson." I guess to be 100% one would call it Jefferson Smith's Parlor. It should be noted that Soapy had at least 2 other saloons that were considered under his operation. Those details are in my book.
  • Paragraph 3: Martin gives Soapy credit for the terms "sure-thing" and "sure-thing men." I can't verify this.
  • Paragraph 4: There is no other contemporary works that state that Soapy's men were known as "tigers" or "lambs."
  • Paragraph 14-15: There is no evidence Soapy or his men "played a joke" or robbed any of the men of cloth that came to Skagway.
Page 51
  • Paragraph 1-7: The continuation of the supposed "jokes" or robbery of Skagway ministers. There is no contemporary evidence.
  • Paragraph 8-9: These two paragraphs can actually be attributed to much of Soapy's adult life not just in Skagway.
  • Paragraph 10: Martin writes that Soapy's private army was the "national guard." Actually, his army was named the Skagway Military Company.

End of part 1. (watch for part 2 coming soon!)




Jeff Smith









.

January 19, 2012

Same old bogus lottery swindle.

"Where there's a bill, there's a way"




Pensioners fall victim to bogus lottery "win"

The following comes from the East Grinstead Courier and Observer, January 19, 2012 and was post on Sussex.

AN elderly couple were tricked into believing they had won £12,000 – but instead were conned out of £1,750.

Pensioners Michael and Jane Haigh have been left struggling financially since they were stung by the overseas scam.

Michael and Jane Haigh
 

The couple, of Shepherds Grove Road in Hammerwood, were fooled into parting with their hard-earned cash to release the "winnings" in November.

But after weeks of daring demands and persistent phone calls from people claiming they were from the "Euro World Lotto Corporation", the pair realised they had fallen victim to a cold-calling lottery fraud.

Mrs Haigh, 69, said: "It was just awful. It was absolutely traumatic. Michael got phone calls for weeks afterwards. They absolutely hounded him.

"One day, he got this phone call out of the blue, saying he had won. He thought it must be right, because it was the same firm that he has used before.

"They gave him instructions to go down to the bank and get money out. They then said the money had not gone through and he had to do it again.This carried on going until we realised what was going on. It was just a nightmare from then on."

Mr Haigh, 70, had used the lottery firm, which no longer exists, more than a year ago, which led him to believe the fraudulent phone call was legitimate.

He explained: "They said I had won e14,000, or £12,000. I couldn't believe it at first. Then all the phone calls came. The problem was I had to pay them the VAT, which they said I would immediately get back with the winnings.

"I realise in retrospect that I was fooled, but being of an older generation I had tended to trust people more than I should, especially when the initial contact seemed bona fide.

"I thought it was worth going for, but I ended up losing £1,750.

"I don't feel bitter about it, because in one sense it's my own fault. But I feel betrayed by the people who are constantly telling me I'm a very lucky person. I feel it doesn't speak very highly of human nature.

"I'm left now picking up the pieces to restore my own bank balance."

Sussex Police has issued a warning following further reports of people in the area, particularly the elderly and vulnerable, being targeted by individuals claiming to be from foreign lotteries.

PC Kate Buckler said: "There might have been other victims. If you are contacted in this way about an alleged lottery win, please remember – if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

"Keep your personal details and finances safe and never agree to any financial transaction over the phone with someone you don't know."

I responded with the following...


I am sorry for their loss. They are not alone. This bunco swindle has changed little in 150 years, minus the technology used. Human nature has not changed nor have the methods used by the gangs of con men to separate the unwary from their cash.

My great-grandfather was an American confidence man of the old west. Those interested in history might recognize the name "Soapy" Smith. Many of the same games he operated in the 1880s are still used today. Besides displaying the very interesting history of Soapy Smith, my websites also serve to educate people about the various methods employed by those who use their wits to rob their prey.


Jeff Smith









.